[pLog-svn] About the admin page width

Oscar Renalias oscar at renalias.net
Wed Jan 11 19:09:04 GMT 2006


This doesn't look good on either Safari 2.0.3 or Firefox 1.5 under OS  
X 10.4.4. I have attached an screenshot from each one of them, but  
basically everything is being shifted to the bottom of the page  
(presumably because either the left or right column is too wide)

Oscar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: firefox_shot.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 197028 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http:// devel.lifetype.net/pipermail/plog-svn/attachments/20060111/011ba5f2/firefox_shot-0001.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: safari_shot.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 210659 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http:// devel.lifetype.net/pipermail/plog-svn/attachments/20060111/011ba5f2/safari_shot-0001.jpg
-------------- next part --------------

On 11 Jan 2006, at 12:53, Mark Wu wrote:

> Okay, I am already commit the changes I propose in SVN rev 2767.  
> Including
> Option Show/Hide and Dynamic Drop-Down Menu.
>
> Please kindly give it a try. I already test them under FF/IE/OPERA.
>
> One oproblem, seems opera can not recogonize CSS well, it always
> misundersting our CSS setting. :( So, the layout is ugly and  
> buggy .. Can I
> ignore opera?  I think FF and IE already dominate the most browser  
> market.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:43 PM
> To: 'Mark Wu'; 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
>
> Oops... I forgot attached the screen shots ...
>
> Regards, Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:41 PM
> To: 'Mark Wu'; 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
>
> Hi All:
>
> About the 1st item, I already implemented in my notebook. The  
> effect looks
> greats. I also test it in Firefox 1.0/1.5, opera, and IE 6, all of  
> them
> works great. BTW, I use RICO Ajax effect library. This library is  
> base on
> Prototype.
>
> With this feature, I think we don't need to change the screen to  
> 1024 any
> more... :p
>
> I am also thinking implement this hide/show skill in "custom  
> section" in
> newpost/editpot. It can hide the custom field unit we need to use  
> it ... It
> will save a lot of screen space...
>
> I will also try to use cookie to remember these settings ...
>
> But, If we get more effects on the pages, that means we need to  
> spend more
> "cpu time" on client, and bandwidth in server... It is a trade off..
>
> Anyway, I will commit the code to 1.1 trunk after I clear some html  
> and
> javscript garbages...
>
> Then, you can decide to keep this feature or not ..
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:15 PM
> To: 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
>
> HI Oscar:
>
> 1. I think most pages are okay, the only one problem is newpost and  
> editpost
> page.  I am thinking to add a button to let user to hide or show  
> the options
> in the right sides.  So, it can make the WYSIWYG looks larger ...
> 2. Do you remember I add a pull-down menu before? I plan to add it  
> to 1.1
> with user options. The user can enable/disable it through  
> blogsettings. The
> default will be current menu-style 3. And, I also plan to review  
> all CSS
> settings, to make them looks the same in IE/FF, even in English and  
> Other
> languages... It can avoid very small font in other language.
>
> ** I already compare our UI with Wodpress' UI, I don't think our  
> options too
> complex or too much. It just because the width is too narrow to  
> include
> them... :P
>
> How do you think?
>
> Hi  Reto:
>
> I like 1024 then 800 actually. It can make the newpost/editpost  
> more larger
> (I believe it is the most used page in blogging system) .... :p  
> But, change
> the width will be a big pain .... There are so many settings are  
> hard-code
> in template, for example, articlelist, categorylist pages ...
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar  
> Renalias
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:10 AM
> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
>
> I'm not really up for some redesign of the admin interface. It was  
> quite a
> lot of work to implement the way it is now...
>
> But if 800 pixels is not really enough for our pages, could it be that
> they're already too complex? Can we do some work to make them even  
> easier
> before adding more fields?
>
> Oscar
>
> On 10 Jan 2006, at 18:13, Mark Wu wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> Our current admin page width is 800, but it is a little bit small  
>> when
>> everyone's screen gettting bigger and bigger. Do you think en- large
>> it to 1024 or "fit the border" is a good idea? Or you like to keep in
>> current width?
>>
>> Mark
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>



More information about the pLog-svn mailing list