[pLog-svn] r6714 - in plugins/branches/lifetype-1.2: . rssimport rssimport/class rssimport/class/action rssimport/class/view rssimport/locale rssimport/templates

[Jon Daley]

 	Yes, now I remember you saying that.  I didn't notice much 
difference in my application, though I didn't check very carefully either. 
Neither one made any significant load on the system.

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Mark Wu wrote:

> The only one problem of simple pie is memory usgae.
>
> I did the test before, the memory  usage of simple is bigger than magpieRSS
> ....  The difference is pretty big ...
>
> Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Jon Daley
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 2:24 AM
> To: LifeType Developer List
> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r6714 - in plugins/branches/lifetype-1.2: .
> rssimport rssimport/class rssimport/class/action rssimport/class/view
> rssimport/locale rssimport/templates
>
> 	Yes.  I had to adjust a couple of the configurable settings with
> simplepie to make it work with different encodings, but much less work than
> I did on magpie, and better results.
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Paul Westbrook wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello,
>>    This plugin is using the rss parser that is included in the base
>> LifeType install.  Would you recommend that we switch to using
>> simplepie?
>>
>> - --Paul
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
>>
>> iD8DBQFIwCAgQIx6KJgT81kRAo0pAJwPSnqH8Wwn5s/FRdAf2GEnSi5SogCfW1qa
>> o7qiz/l6m6+/gKvrqXUnY64=
>> =DcnJ
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Jon Daley
>> <plogworld at jon.limedaley.com>
>> wrote:
>>       On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Paul Westbrook wrote:
>>          The link to the rss item comes straight out of
>>       LifeType's
>>       xml parser.  If you look at the feed from google
>>       reader, does the
>>       url look good there?
>>
>>        Yes, it looks fine straight from google, but bad once magpie
>> parses it.  In another project, I had trouble with magpie being able
>> to parse various kinds of feeds, and ended up using simplepie, which
>> had a higher success rate.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jon Daley
> http://jon.limedaley.com
> ~~
> Everybody repeat after me,
> "We are all individuals"
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>

-- 
Jon Daley
http://jon.limedaley.com
~~
Use of excessive, unnecessary, commas, has always been,
   one of my, pet peeves.