[pLog-svn] r4361 - in plog/trunk: class/action class/action/admin templates/admin templates/standard

Jon Daley plogworld at jon.limedaley.com
Tue Nov 28 23:42:52 GMT 2006


On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Reto Hugi wrote:
>> but it can
>> always be done so that the template is copied to the user's template
>> and instead of {include file="$misctemplatepath/
>> commentform.template"} you've got {include file="$blogtemplate/
>> commentform.template"}
>
> yes, but the other way round is true, too.
 	I think this way is better than before.  If is modifying their 
template, they will have to find the commentform.template and will realize 
that the current code is not pointing to their current directory.
 	Maybe we will end up having lots of people complaining about it, 
but I think more people complain about the current method.

> maybe, but I don't think this one changes a lot. Your commit broke quite
> a few templates, though, I suppose...
 	I don't understand.  What broke?



More information about the pLog-svn mailing list