[pLog-svn] r3385 - inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/uilocale templates/admin

[Oscar Renalias]

If that's what you're trying to do... Have you ever tried using  
custom URLs but instead of /blog/{whatever}/{whateverelse} using / 
blog.php/{whatever}/{whateverelse}? I think it's exactly what you're  
trying to achieve here.

This has been supported since the very beginning, but I always forget  
to advertise this feature.

Perhaps we should enable custom URLs by default using these settings?

On 12 May 2006, at 21:10, Mark Wu wrote:

> Not all VHS can support .htaccess ... But user still want to have a  
> nice
> looking url when they install lifetype in those VHS ....
>
> That's why lss make this :)
>
> Mark
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
>> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Jon Daley
>> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 2:04 AM
>> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] r3385 -
>> inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/uilocale templates/admin
>>
>>  	Yes, there have been a couple people who had to turn it
>> on manually, but most people are fine.
>>  	Why would someone pick this method over custom URLs?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 13 May 2006, Mark Wu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi lss &  Oscar:
>>>
>>> Get rid of all "?" and "&", just
>>> <http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}>
>>> http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}
>>>
>>> I like this idea....
>>>
>>> But, does apache support pathinfo in default?
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>  _____
>>>
>>> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
>>> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of lss
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 12:07 AM
>>> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3385 -
>>> inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale
>> templates/admin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps it doesn't sound that bad after all, but I fail to see what
>>> the difference is between this new method and normal plain URLs. The
>>> '?' is still there...
>>>
>>>
>>> hi Oscar:
>>>
>>> although, the '?' is still there, but there is no '&' ,
>> this makes URLs
>>> looks more pretty.
>>>
>>> why I make these two new url modes ? if I have some AP need
>> url of resource
>>> / article as one of the get variables , the '&' will broke
>> our url. for
>>> example:
>>>
>>>
>> http://some.where/someAP.php?url=http://blog.mysite/resserver.
>> php?blogId=1
>>>
>> <http://some.where/someAP.php?url=http://blog.mysite/resserver
>> .php?blogId=1&
>>> resource=2_15.gif> &resource=2_15.gif
>>>
>>> if you don't like '?' , it may change to pathinfo like this:
>>>
>>> http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}
>>>
>>> what do you think ?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> ==============
>>> lsslss
>>> ===============
>>>
>>>
>>
>> **************************************
>> Jon Daley
>> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>>
>> I always blame the software. Unless I wrote it.
>> Then I blame the hardware.
>> -- Forest Godfrey
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>