[pLog-svn] r3385 - inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin

[Jon Daley]

 	Yes, there have been a couple people who had to turn it on 
manually, but most people are fine.
 	Why would someone pick this method over custom URLs?


On Sat, 13 May 2006, Mark Wu wrote:

> Hi lss &  Oscar:
>
> Get rid of all "?" and "&", just
> <http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}>
> http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}
>
> I like this idea....
>
> But, does apache support pathinfo in default?
>
> Mark
>
>
>  _____
>
> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of lss
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 12:07 AM
> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3385 -
> inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin
>
>
>
> Perhaps it doesn't sound that bad after all, but I fail to see what
> the difference is between this new method and normal plain URLs. The
> '?' is still there...
>
>
> hi Oscar:
>
> although, the '?' is still there, but there is no '&' , this makes URLs
> looks more pretty.
>
> why I make these two new url modes ? if I have some AP need url of resource
> / article as one of the get variables , the '&' will broke our url. for
> example:
>
> http://some.where/someAP.php?url=http://blog.mysite/resserver.php?blogId=1
> <http://some.where/someAP.php?url=http://blog.mysite/resserver.php?blogId=1&
> resource=2_15.gif> &resource=2_15.gif
>
> if you don't like '?' , it may change to pathinfo like this:
>
> http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}
>
> what do you think ?
>
> -- 
> ==============
> lsslss
> ===============
>
>

**************************************
Jon Daley
http://jon.limedaley.com/

I always blame the software. Unless I wrote it.
Then I blame the hardware.
-- Forest Godfrey