[pLog-svn] r3385 - inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin

Mark Wu markplace at gmail.com
Fri May 12 17:52:26 GMT 2006


Hi lss &  Oscar:
 
Get rid of all "?" and "&", just
<http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}>
http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}
 
I like this idea....
 
But, does apache support pathinfo in default?
 
Mark


  _____  

From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
[mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of lss
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 12:07 AM
To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3385 -
inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin



Perhaps it doesn't sound that bad after all, but I fail to see what
the difference is between this new method and normal plain URLs. The 
'?' is still there...


hi Oscar:

although, the '?' is still there, but there is no '&' , this makes URLs
looks more pretty. 

why I make these two new url modes ? if I have some AP need url of resource
/ article as one of the get variables , the '&' will broke our url. for
example: 

http://some.where/someAP.php?url=http://blog.mysite/resserver.php?blogId=1
<http://some.where/someAP.php?url=http://blog.mysite/resserver.php?blogId=1&
resource=2_15.gif> &resource=2_15.gif

if you don't like '?' , it may change to pathinfo like this:

http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}

what do you think ?

-- 
==============
lsslss
=============== 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http:// devel.lifetype.net/pipermail/plog-svn/attachments/20060513/f017ca3b/attachment-0001.html


More information about the pLog-svn mailing list