[pLog-svn] r3385 - inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui
locale templates/admin
Mark Wu
markplace at gmail.com
Fri May 12 17:52:26 GMT 2006
Hi lss & Oscar:
Get rid of all "?" and "&", just
<http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}>
http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}
I like this idea....
But, does apache support pathinfo in default?
Mark
_____
From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
[mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of lss
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 12:07 AM
To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3385 -
inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin
Perhaps it doesn't sound that bad after all, but I fail to see what
the difference is between this new method and normal plain URLs. The
'?' is still there...
hi Oscar:
although, the '?' is still there, but there is no '&' , this makes URLs
looks more pretty.
why I make these two new url modes ? if I have some AP need url of resource
/ article as one of the get variables , the '&' will broke our url. for
example:
http://some.where/someAP.php?url=http://blog.mysite/resserver.php?blogId=1
<http://some.where/someAP.php?url=http://blog.mysite/resserver.php?blogId=1&
resource=2_15.gif> &resource=2_15.gif
if you don't like '?' , it may change to pathinfo like this:
http://blog.my.site/index.php/{function}/{path}/{info}
what do you think ?
--
==============
lsslss
===============
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http:// devel.lifetype.net/pipermail/plog-svn/attachments/20060513/f017ca3b/attachment-0001.html
More information about the pLog-svn
mailing list