[pLog-svn] r3352 - in plog/trunk: class/action/adminclass/daoclass/view/admin templates/admin

Oscar Renalias oscar at renalias.net
Sun May 7 11:16:18 GMT 2006


I had a long shower this morning, so "mentioned very clean" is not  
really wrong wording. I was very clean when I said it :-)))

On 7 May 2006, at 14:08, Mark Wu wrote:

> Sorry, wrong wording ..  :P
>
> "metioned very clean " --> should be "metioned very clear"
>
> Mark
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 7:07 PM
>> To: 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
>> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] r3352 - in plog/trunk:
>> class/action/adminclass/daoclass/view/admin templates/admin
>>
>> Hi Oscar:
>>
>> As we discussed in this thread. I think you metioned very
>> clean about the article.in_summary_page only used in removing
>> "configuration" post from summary page and nothing else. So,
>> I just revert the rev. 3352 change to rev. 3351  in SVN rev 3355.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
>>> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar
>>> Renalias
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 6:20 PM
>>> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3352 - in plog/trunk:
>>> class/action/adminclass/daoclass/view/admin templates/admin
>>>
>>> The thing is, I don't know why we're making everything too
>> complicated
>>> and exposing the functionality of hiding certain articles from the
>>> front page and showing the rest. I think that one blog-wide
>> setting is
>>> enough. The in_summary_page field in the articles table was
>> only meant
>>> to be used with the 'congratulations' post so that we could
>> avoid the
>>> LIKE queries, nothing else.
>>>
>>> On 7 May 2006, at 12:55, Mark Wu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mmm.... I think doable...
>>>>
>>>> 1. I have to revert the code change that you made
>>> yesterday, we only
>>>> deicide the article show in summary or not through
>>>> article.in_summary_page 2. I also have to remove the
>>>> default_article_in_summary  in blogsetting that I made
>>> yesterday 3. I
>>>> will use blog_show_in_summary as the default value of in_summary
>>>> parameters in newPost page ...
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, the blogs.show_in_summary only used in those
>>> blog-related
>>>> statistics in summary stats ... Like active blogs, recent
>> blogs ...
>>>>
>>>> How do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
>>>>> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar
>>>>> Renalias
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 4:24 PM
>>>>> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>>>> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3352 - in plog/trunk:
>>>>> class/action/admin class/daoclass/view/admin templates/admin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ** In our current summary stats, the article will show in
>>>>> summary page
>>>>>> only both blog.show_in_summary and article.in_summmary_page
>>>>> are true.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps we should change this behaviour?
>>>>>
>>>>> It should probably be so that blog settings take
>> precedence unless
>>>>> specified in the article?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> pLog-svn mailing list
>>>>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>>>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pLog-svn mailing list
>>>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pLog-svn mailing list
>>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>



More information about the pLog-svn mailing list