[pLog-svn] About the template suggest.

[BalearWeb]

But that is not the "logic" that we use in paging.
What I'm trying to say is that we have to be consistent
between the meaning of << and >> in posts and pages:

Maybe we could use this solution:
<< Newer (page) - 1 - 2 -  3 -  4 -  5 - Older (page) >>
<< Newer (post) | Older (post) >>


Jon Daley wrote:

>     When I think next, I think next post in time, so I wouldn't 
> mismatch the next and previous like you did in your example.
>     I think next goes with >> and goes to the post later in time.
>
> Ex.
> I went to the store.  NEXT, I went to the bank.  Which came first?
>
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, BalearWeb wrote:
>
>> Jon Daley wrote:
>>
>>> ....I don't know which is the best choice, but I think
>>>
>>>> we have to be consistent.
>>>
>>>
>>>     I didn't look at the bug report yet, but yes, I always thought 
>>> it was strange that left went to the next post.  I thought maybe it 
>>> was just Americans who would assume right means next.
>>
>>
>> I also assume right means next, next page, next day. The problem is what
>> do you understand by "next post"? The post written afterwards or before
>> the current post?
>> Normally the post that comes next in a page is the older, but
>> value=$post->getNextArticle() means the newer. So I think that is why
>> the arrows Next is pointing to the left.
>> But I think we should leave it like this:
>>
>> <p id="Nextpost">
>>       {assign var=nextpost value=$post->getNextArticle()}
>>       {if $nextpost == true}
>> <a href="{$url->postPermalink($nextpost)}"
>> title="{$locale->tr("next_post")}:
>> {$nextpost->getTopic()}">&laquo;{$locale->tr("previous_post")}</a> |
>>          {/if}
>>       {assign var=prevpost value=$post->getPrevArticle()}
>>          {if $prevpost == true}
>> <a href="{$url->postPermalink($prevpost)}"
>> title="{$locale->tr("previous_post")}:
>> {$prevpost->getTopic()}">{$locale->tr("netx_post")}&raquo;</a>
>>          {/if}
>> </p>
>>
>> What do you think? Its a sort of contradiction...
>>
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like the configuration option 
>>> trackback_server_enabled is used anywhere else in the code?  Does 
>>> setting this option to false actually do anything?
>>
>>
>> I have no idea. I suppose you are not asking me ;-)
>>
>>> More over I wanted to display the locale message comment_html_allowed
>>> The config option you want is: html_allowed_tags_in_comments, but I 
>>> don't think this option, or the trackback_server_enabled are 
>>> available to grab from the templates.
>>
>>
>> Never mind. In fact, I think I'm not going to allow any HTML tags until
>> I can make sure that they cannot leave open tags and affect the layout
>> of the blog.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
>