[pLog-svn] About the admin page width

Thu Jan 12 12:51:11 GMT 2006

I can't really say, but I don't think they're too different.

Oscar

On 1/12/06, Mark Wu <markplace at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Oscar:
>
> Do you know how much difference between Safari and Konquerer. If their dom
> model are pretty the same, then I will use Konquerer to test.
>
> Mark
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> > [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of
> > Oscar Renalias
> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:54 AM
> > To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> >
> > Hmmm... even though I can swear I cleaned the cache and
> > reloaded the page like 3 or 4 times when I reported this,
> > everything seems to be ok now. I just activated
> > devel.lifetype.net again and now it looks ok both in Firefox
> > and Safari so please disregard my previous comment.
> >
> > Regarding some of these changes, a few comments:
> >
> > - we have to check why the list of categories is not being
> > reloaded after adding one. The category is added, it is
> > available via manage-  >categories but does not appear in the list.
> >
> > - The "add" button should be deactivated while the category
> > is being added. Users clicking the button more than once
> > (slow connection,
> > whatever) might end up adding the same category too many
> > times. It should be reactivated once the server has confirmed
> > that it has been added.
> >
> > - Can we move the "hide | show" links to the right side of the form?
> > They activate/deactivate the right column, so I believe they
> > should be on the right side instead of left.
> >
> > - What happens to these features if javascript support for
> > ajax or whatever is needed is not available?
> >
> > Oscar
> >
> > On 11 Jan 2006, at 21:09, Oscar Renalias wrote:
> >
> > > This doesn't look good on either Safari 2.0.3 or Firefox
> > 1.5 under OS
> > > X 10.4.4. I have attached an screenshot from each one of them, but
> > > basically everything is being shifted to the bottom of the page
> > > (presumably because either the left or right column is too wide)
> > >
> > > Oscar
> > > <firefox_shot.jpg>
> > > <safari_shot.jpg>
> > >
> > > On 11 Jan 2006, at 12:53, Mark Wu wrote:
> > >
> > >> Okay, I am already commit the changes I propose in SVN rev 2767.
> > >> Including
> > >> Option Show/Hide and Dynamic Drop-Down Menu.
> > >>
> > >> Please kindly give it a try. I already test them under FF/IE/OPERA.
> > >>
> > >> One oproblem, seems opera can not recogonize CSS well, it always
> > >> misundersting our CSS setting. :( So, the layout is ugly
> > and buggy ..
> > >> Can I ignore opera?  I think FF and IE already dominate the most
> > >> browser market.
> > >>
> > >> Mark
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:43 PM
> > >> To: 'Mark Wu'; 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> > >> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > >>
> > >> Oops... I forgot attached the screen shots ...
> > >>
> > >> Regards, Mark
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:41 PM
> > >> To: 'Mark Wu'; 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> > >> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > >>
> > >> Hi All:
> > >>
> > >> About the 1st item, I already implemented in my notebook.
> > The effect
> > >> looks greats. I also test it in Firefox 1.0/1.5, opera,
> > and IE 6, all
> > >> of them works great. BTW, I use RICO Ajax effect library. This
> > >> library is base on Prototype.
> > >>
> > >> With this feature, I think we don't need to change the screen to
> > >> 1024 any
> > >> more... :p
> > >>
> > >> I am also thinking implement this hide/show skill in
> > "custom section"
> > >> in newpost/editpot. It can hide the custom field unit we
> > need to use
> > >> it ... It will save a lot of screen space...
> > >>
> > >> I will also try to use cookie to remember these settings ...
> > >>
> > >> But, If we get more effects on the pages, that means we
> > need to spend
> > >> more "cpu time" on client, and bandwidth in server... It
> > is a trade
> > >> off..
> > >>
> > >> Anyway, I will commit the code to 1.1 trunk after I clear
> > some html
> > >> and javscript garbages...
> > >>
> > >> Then, you can decide to keep this feature or not ..
> > >>
> > >> Mark
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:15 PM
> > >> To: 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> > >> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > >>
> > >> HI Oscar:
> > >>
> > >> 1. I think most pages are okay, the only one problem is
> > newpost and
> > >> editpost page.  I am thinking to add a button to let user
> > to hide or
> > >> show the options in the right sides.  So, it can make the WYSIWYG
> > >> looks larger ...
> > >> 2. Do you remember I add a pull-down menu before? I plan
> > to add it to
> > >> 1.1 with user options. The user can enable/disable it through
> > >> blogsettings. The default will be current menu-style 3.
> > And, I also
> > >> plan to review all CSS settings, to make them looks the same in
> > >> IE/FF, even in English and Other languages... It can avoid
> > very small
> > >> font in other language.
> > >>
> > >> ** I already compare our UI with Wodpress' UI, I don't think our
> > >> options too complex or too much. It just because the width is too
> > >> narrow to include them... :P
> > >>
> > >> How do you think?
> > >>
> > >> Hi  Reto:
> > >>
> > >> I like 1024 then 800 actually. It can make the
> > newpost/editpost more
> > >> larger (I believe it is the most used page in blogging
> > system) ....
> > >> :p But, change the width will be a big pain .... There are so many
> > >> settings are hard-code in template, for example, articlelist,
> > >> categorylist pages ...
> > >>
> > >> Mark
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> > >> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar
> > >> Renalias
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:10 AM
> > >> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > >> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > >>
> > >> I'm not really up for some redesign of the admin
> > interface. It was
> > >> quite a
> > >> lot of work to implement the way it is now...
> > >>
> > >> But if 800 pixels is not really enough for our pages, could it be
> > >> that
> > >> they're already too complex? Can we do some work to make
> > them even
> > >> easier
> > >> before adding more fields?
> > >>
> > >> Oscar
> > >>
> > >> On 10 Jan 2006, at 18:13, Mark Wu wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi All:
> > >>>
> > >>> Our current admin page width is 800, but it is a little
> > bit small
> > >>> when
> > >>> everyone's screen gettting bigger and bigger. Do you
> > think en- large
> > >>> it to 1024 or "fit the border" is a good idea? Or you like to
> > >>> keep in
> > >>> current width?
> > >>>
> > >>> Mark
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> pLog-svn mailing list
> > >>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > >>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> pLog-svn mailing list
> > >> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > >> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> pLog-svn mailing list
> > >> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > >> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pLog-svn mailing list
> > > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>