[pLog-svn] About the admin page width

Mark Wu markplace at gmail.com
Thu Jan 12 13:51:13 GMT 2006


Hi Alex:

Thanks, actually I used script.aculo.us first, then I switch to rico .... :P
Because the rico library implement resizer effect better then
script.aculo.us.

I already try moo.fx, their sizer function is a little bit werid. :( But,
still works...

MArk

> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net 
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of 
> Alexander Kaiser
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:51 PM
> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> 
> i integrated scriptaculous on kulando.de for some small 
> status messages like "trackback send", "post published" etc. 
> i think even tho the scriptaculous is a bit bigger, it should 
> added to lifetype <> more options, better future dev.
> 
> 
> On 1/12/06, Mark Wu <markplace at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Oscar:
> >
> > Do you know how much difference between Safari and 
> Konquerer. If their 
> > dom model are pretty the same, then I will use Konquerer to test.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> > > [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar 
> > > Renalias
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:54 AM
> > > To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > >
> > > Hmmm... even though I can swear I cleaned the cache and 
> reloaded the 
> > > page like 3 or 4 times when I reported this, everything 
> seems to be 
> > > ok now. I just activated devel.lifetype.net again and now 
> it looks 
> > > ok both in Firefox and Safari so please disregard my previous 
> > > comment.
> > >
> > > Regarding some of these changes, a few comments:
> > >
> > > - we have to check why the list of categories is not 
> being reloaded 
> > > after adding one. The category is added, it is available 
> via manage-  
> > > >categories but does not appear in the list.
> > >
> > > - The "add" button should be deactivated while the 
> category is being 
> > > added. Users clicking the button more than once (slow connection,
> > > whatever) might end up adding the same category too many 
> times. It 
> > > should be reactivated once the server has confirmed that 
> it has been 
> > > added.
> > >
> > > - Can we move the "hide | show" links to the right side 
> of the form?
> > > They activate/deactivate the right column, so I believe 
> they should 
> > > be on the right side instead of left.
> > >
> > > - What happens to these features if javascript support 
> for ajax or 
> > > whatever is needed is not available?
> > >
> > > Oscar
> > >
> > > On 11 Jan 2006, at 21:09, Oscar Renalias wrote:
> > >
> > > > This doesn't look good on either Safari 2.0.3 or Firefox
> > > 1.5 under OS
> > > > X 10.4.4. I have attached an screenshot from each one 
> of them, but 
> > > > basically everything is being shifted to the bottom of the page 
> > > > (presumably because either the left or right column is too wide)
> > > >
> > > > Oscar
> > > > <firefox_shot.jpg>
> > > > <safari_shot.jpg>
> > > >
> > > > On 11 Jan 2006, at 12:53, Mark Wu wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Okay, I am already commit the changes I propose in SVN 
> rev 2767.
> > > >> Including
> > > >> Option Show/Hide and Dynamic Drop-Down Menu.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please kindly give it a try. I already test them under 
> FF/IE/OPERA.
> > > >>
> > > >> One oproblem, seems opera can not recogonize CSS well, 
> it always 
> > > >> misundersting our CSS setting. :( So, the layout is ugly
> > > and buggy ..
> > > >> Can I ignore opera?  I think FF and IE already 
> dominate the most 
> > > >> browser market.
> > > >>
> > > >> Mark
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:43 PM
> > > >> To: 'Mark Wu'; 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> > > >> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > > >>
> > > >> Oops... I forgot attached the screen shots ...
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards, Mark
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:41 PM
> > > >> To: 'Mark Wu'; 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> > > >> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi All:
> > > >>
> > > >> About the 1st item, I already implemented in my notebook.
> > > The effect
> > > >> looks greats. I also test it in Firefox 1.0/1.5, opera,
> > > and IE 6, all
> > > >> of them works great. BTW, I use RICO Ajax effect library. This 
> > > >> library is base on Prototype.
> > > >>
> > > >> With this feature, I think we don't need to change the 
> screen to
> > > >> 1024 any
> > > >> more... :p
> > > >>
> > > >> I am also thinking implement this hide/show skill in
> > > "custom section"
> > > >> in newpost/editpot. It can hide the custom field unit we
> > > need to use
> > > >> it ... It will save a lot of screen space...
> > > >>
> > > >> I will also try to use cookie to remember these settings ...
> > > >>
> > > >> But, If we get more effects on the pages, that means we
> > > need to spend
> > > >> more "cpu time" on client, and bandwidth in server... It
> > > is a trade
> > > >> off..
> > > >>
> > > >> Anyway, I will commit the code to 1.1 trunk after I clear
> > > some html
> > > >> and javscript garbages...
> > > >>
> > > >> Then, you can decide to keep this feature or not ..
> > > >>
> > > >> Mark
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:15 PM
> > > >> To: 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
> > > >> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > > >>
> > > >> HI Oscar:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. I think most pages are okay, the only one problem is
> > > newpost and
> > > >> editpost page.  I am thinking to add a button to let user
> > > to hide or
> > > >> show the options in the right sides.  So, it can make 
> the WYSIWYG 
> > > >> looks larger ...
> > > >> 2. Do you remember I add a pull-down menu before? I plan
> > > to add it to
> > > >> 1.1 with user options. The user can enable/disable it through 
> > > >> blogsettings. The default will be current menu-style 3.
> > > And, I also
> > > >> plan to review all CSS settings, to make them looks 
> the same in 
> > > >> IE/FF, even in English and Other languages... It can avoid
> > > very small
> > > >> font in other language.
> > > >>
> > > >> ** I already compare our UI with Wodpress' UI, I don't 
> think our 
> > > >> options too complex or too much. It just because the 
> width is too 
> > > >> narrow to include them... :P
> > > >>
> > > >> How do you think?
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi  Reto:
> > > >>
> > > >> I like 1024 then 800 actually. It can make the
> > > newpost/editpost more
> > > >> larger (I believe it is the most used page in blogging
> > > system) ....
> > > >> :p But, change the width will be a big pain .... There are so 
> > > >> many settings are hard-code in template, for example, 
> > > >> articlelist, categorylist pages ...
> > > >>
> > > >> Mark
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> > > >> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf 
> Of Oscar 
> > > >> Renalias
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:10 AM
> > > >> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > >> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] About the admin page width
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm not really up for some redesign of the admin
> > > interface. It was
> > > >> quite a
> > > >> lot of work to implement the way it is now...
> > > >>
> > > >> But if 800 pixels is not really enough for our pages, 
> could it be 
> > > >> that they're already too complex? Can we do some work to make
> > > them even
> > > >> easier
> > > >> before adding more fields?
> > > >>
> > > >> Oscar
> > > >>
> > > >> On 10 Jan 2006, at 18:13, Mark Wu wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi All:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Our current admin page width is 800, but it is a little
> > > bit small
> > > >>> when
> > > >>> everyone's screen gettting bigger and bigger. Do you
> > > think en- large
> > > >>> it to 1024 or "fit the border" is a good idea? Or you like to 
> > > >>> keep in current width?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Mark
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> pLog-svn mailing list
> > > >>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > >>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> pLog-svn mailing list
> > > >> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > >> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> pLog-svn mailing list
> > > >> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > >> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > pLog-svn mailing list
> > > > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > > http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pLog-svn mailing list
> > > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn



More information about the pLog-svn mailing list