[pLog-svn] spam

[Oscar Renalias]

Any volunteers? :)

On 18 Dec 2006, at 01:11, Oscar Renalias wrote:

> Good point. And I think that there isn't any downside to it...
>
> On 18 Dec 2006, at 00:48, Jon Daley wrote:
>
>> 	What if you left it as a plugin, but installed the plugin by  
>> default?  Is there a downside to doing it that way?
>>
>> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Oscar Renalias wrote:
>>
>>> This sounds promising... Would there be anyone interested in  
>>> helping out integrating the latest bb plugin with 1.2/trunk?
>>>
>>> On 17 Dec 2006, at 14:58, Jon Daley wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Reto Hugi wrote:
>>>>> I don't have experience with bad behaviour because, but how  
>>>>> likely does
>>>>> it block legit users? False positives should be a very small  
>>>>> number if
>>>>> it's included in the core, imo.
>>>>
>>>> 	I have only had one legit user blocked that I know about, and I  
>>>> commented out that check when it happened.  I have not had any  
>>>> problems with it.
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jon Daley
>>>> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>>>> The real world is
>>>> a special case.
>>>> -- Horngren's Observation
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pLog-svn mailing list
>>>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pLog-svn mailing list
>>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
>> -- 
>> Jon Daley
>> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>>
>> If you're not part of the solution,
>>   you're part of the precipitate.
>> -- Steven Wright
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>