[pLog-svn] spam

[Oscar Renalias]

Good point. And I think that there isn't any downside to it...

On 18 Dec 2006, at 00:48, Jon Daley wrote:

> 	What if you left it as a plugin, but installed the plugin by  
> default?  Is there a downside to doing it that way?
>
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Oscar Renalias wrote:
>
>> This sounds promising... Would there be anyone interested in  
>> helping out integrating the latest bb plugin with 1.2/trunk?
>>
>> On 17 Dec 2006, at 14:58, Jon Daley wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Reto Hugi wrote:
>>>> I don't have experience with bad behaviour because, but how  
>>>> likely does
>>>> it block legit users? False positives should be a very small  
>>>> number if
>>>> it's included in the core, imo.
>>>
>>> 	I have only had one legit user blocked that I know about, and I  
>>> commented out that check when it happened.  I have not had any  
>>> problems with it.
>>> -- 
>>> Jon Daley
>>> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>>> The real world is
>>> a special case.
>>> -- Horngren's Observation
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pLog-svn mailing list
>>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
> -- 
> Jon Daley
> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>
> If you're not part of the solution,
>   you're part of the precipitate.
> -- Steven Wright
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>