[pLog-svn] Which one should I use?

[Oscar Renalias]

To clear the confusion:

- You should never commit to a folder under tags/. Svn is not going to
prevent you from doing it because svn has no concept of "tags", while
cvs did. Tags in svn are just a copy a source code tree at a certain
time and as a self-imposed rule, we never make changes to tags. Of
course we could always remember that 1.0.2-beta corresponds to
revision 2454 of the repository, but marking it with a tag is always
easier :)

- The 1.0.2 *branch* is still open for bug-fixes. After all, what we
released last weekend is just a beta (and it was tagged as
"plog-1.0.2-beta" instead of "plog-1.0.2") so it is allowed to make
changes. Small changes, if possible... I also a couple of changes
myself, by the way.

- Once we are happy wiht 1.0.2, we'll make another copy from
branches/plog-1.0.2 to tags/plog-1.0.2 or even tags/plog-1.0.2-beta2
and release a second beta if we find it necessary.

- In case you were wondering,  regarding merging 1.0.2 with 1.1, all
we need to do in the future is merge only branches/plog-1.0.2 from
revision 2xxx onwards, so that we don't merge the same stuff twice.

Hope this is clear now :)

Oscar

On 9/20/05, Mark Wu <markplace at gmail.com> wrote:
> Because in 1.0.1, we don't have a tag/10.1-beta ..... We just rlease it
> from branchs/1.0.1. After 1-2 week test, we releast it as official package
> and copy it to tag/1.0.1 ...
> 
> That's why I don't understand why we have a new tag/1.0.2-beta, is that mean
> we have to commit the later 1.0.2 beta bugs fix to /tag/1.0.2-beta or we
> still commit those bugs fix to /branches/1.0.2.
> 
> Mark
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:02 PM
> > To: 'plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net'
> > Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] Which one should I use?
> >
> > Just those bugs list in bugs.plogworld.org.
> >
> > BTW, I don't understand. Do you mean we can't do bug fix in
> > beta period? That's why I ask whick repository to commit
> >
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/svn/plog/plog/branches/plog-1.0.2
> >
> > Or
> >
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/svn/plog/plog/tags/plog-1.0.2-beta
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
> > > [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Jon Daley
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:40 PM
> > > To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > > Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] Which one should I use?
> > >
> > >     You aren't supposed to check into tags, pretty much ever.
> > > Will a release be made either way?  How critical is the bug?
> > >
> > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Mark Wu wrote:
> > > > Hi Oscar:
> > > >
> > > > I want to patch some bug fix for 1.0.2 I fixed yesterday, which
> > > > branchs should I use?
> > > >
> > > > This one:
> > > http://devel.plogworld.net/svn/plog/plog/branches/plog-1.0.2
> > > > or http://devel.plogworld.net/svn/plog/plog/tags/plog-1.0.2-beta
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > >
> > > **************************************
> > > Jon Daley
> > > http://jon.limedaley.com/plog/
> > >
> > > All truth passes through 3 stages.  First, it is ridiculed.
> > > Second, it is violently opposed.  Third, it is accepted as being
> > > self-evident.
> > > -- Arthur Schopenhauer
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pLog-svn mailing list
> > > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>