[pLog-svn] r2480 - in plog/trunk/js: . ie7 ie7/src

[Mark Wu]

If the size is only limit to 50KB, then I think should be okay. Because I
just take a look at the revision 2480, the size of the mail is about 1MB in
outlook, that's why I suggest we remove it, or it will increase the size of
core ...

Personally, I don't like to use the IE7 javscript library, because the
performance is bad (According my bad experience in old version. Maybe it get
better now) :P

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net 
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Jon Daley
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:36 AM
> To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r2480 - in plog/trunk/js: . ie7 ie7/src
> 
>  	If you could not remove the whole directory when you 
> upgrade, that would be better.  Something about the way it 
> was done last time confused subversion.
>  	Perhaps just remove the files instead of the whole ie7 
> directory?
> 
> 
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Reto Hugi wrote:
> > On 19.09.2005 05:22, Mark Wu wrote:
> >> Do we need to include src in core release? I remember only 1 or 2 
> >> templates need this. I suggest we move the ie7 module to template 
> >> itself, or the core of pLog will get bigger and bigger.
> >
> > In the meantime IE7 0.9 is out, which doesn't need the src folder 
> > anymore. I will take care of upgrading it in the trunk (well, it's 
> > actually remove and add).
> >
> > IE7 get's smaller and smaller with every release. Version 
> 0.9 is less 
> > than 50kb zipped. I think it's ok to ship IE7 with plog considering 
> > the size of a plog package of 2.6mb. (Even more since we 
> are providing 
> > "upgrade" packages...)
> >
> > If IE7 would be packed with the templates that need it, this could 
> > result in a rather big overhead for plog hosters that allow 
> the upload 
> > of custom templates for their users.
> >
> > The main reason, why IE7 is already packed with plog is because we 
> > would like to encourage the development of standards compliant 
> > templates. We have template guidelines in our wiki stating that 
> > templates should at least be xhtml compliant - even better xhtml 
> > strict. Asking this, strong usage of CSS is automatically implied. 
> > Thanks to IE7 developers don't need to write bad hacks vor 
> IE and can 
> > still use CSS2/3 in their templates. (i.e. 
> max-width/min-width *just 
> > work* in IE if you include IE7)
> >
> > BTW: IE7 is linked on the front page of the wiki. Any 
> corrections (bad
> > english) are appreciated.
> > http://wiki.plogworld.net/index.php/IE7
> >
> > reto
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> 
> **************************************
> Jon Daley
> http://jon.limedaley.com/plog/
> 
> Do you guys hear the buzzing, or is it just my head?
> -- Professor Shen
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn