=?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogW3BMb2ctc3ZuXSBtZXJnaW5nIHRvIDEuMQ==?=

[subaochen]

Hi oscar,

One idea just come to me: how about just define a empty object class =
instead
of removing it from class hirarchy?=20

Su Baochen


> -----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE-----
> =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net=20
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] =B4=FA=B1=ED Oscar =
Renalias
> =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2005=C4=EA9=D4=C215=C8=D5 23:39
> =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> =D6=F7=CC=E2: Re: [pLog-svn] merging to 1.1
>=20
> It's all yours if you wish... but good luck with it! There=20
> have been plenty of changes in 1.1 in certain folders=20
> (class/dao comes to my
> mind) plus with the whole removal of Object from each one of=20
> the classes when comparing 1.0.2 to 1.1, I don't know what=20
> svn will do.
>=20
> I'll let you know when you can start!
>=20
> Oscar
>=20
> On 15 Sep 2005, at 18:31, Jon Daley wrote:
>=20
> >     I would like to take a crack at merging the changes to 1.0.2 to
> > 1.1 when the time comes.  I have been telling everyone at work how=20
> > great subversion is, and how much better it is than PVCS, where=20
> > merging is just about impossible, so we never branch, or at=20
> least, if=20
> > we do, we never merge back because it is too painful.
> >     So, I would like to see for myself what it takes to merge a=20
> > subversion project.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> >
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>=20
>=20