[pLog-svn] plog 1.0.1 and 1.1

Oscar Renalias oscar at renalias.net
Wed Mar 30 18:19:11 GMT 2005


it's all the same to me... But perhaps as a user I would expect to get 
the most recent development version when fetching the plog/trunk/.

Oscar

On 30 Mar 2005, at 20:28, Francesc Pla Prats wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Mmm sorry but I don't agree with you guys ... I think 1.1 should remain
> as the trunk and 1.0 become a new branch for it's small maintenance
> versions (1.0.x). I always did it this way and it works pretty well,
> also many other people is using it for example Mozilla look at this
> image:
>
> http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap/branching-2005-01-25.png
>
> As you can see when gecko 1.8 is released they create a new branch for
> its maintenance and the new version (1.9) remains as trunk ... you have
> to think that trunk is always the main development version and branches
> are for maintenance of releases ...
>
> Just my $0.02 ...
>
> Francesc.
>
>> as soon as 1.0 is out, there already are a few issues that should be
>> fixed in a later 1.0.1 release, while at the same time we could start
>> working (whoever is interested :-)) in 1.1.
>>
>> I haven't got too much experience in this because so far I was always
>> working alone, but is it better to keep 1.0.1 in the trunk/ folder and
>> create a new branch under branches/plog-1.1? Or the other way around?
>> Any first-hand experiences?
>>
>> Thanks :-)
>>
>> Oscar
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
>> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>




More information about the pLog-svn mailing list