[pLog-svn] plog 1.0.1 and 1.1

Francesc Pla Prats francesc at qdevel.com
Wed Mar 30 17:28:16 GMT 2005


Hi,

Mmm sorry but I don't agree with you guys ... I think 1.1 should remain
as the trunk and 1.0 become a new branch for it's small maintenance
versions (1.0.x). I always did it this way and it works pretty well,
also many other people is using it for example Mozilla look at this
image:

http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap/branching-2005-01-25.png

As you can see when gecko 1.8 is released they create a new branch for
its maintenance and the new version (1.9) remains as trunk ... you have
to think that trunk is always the main development version and branches
are for maintenance of releases ...

Just my $0.02 ...

Francesc.

> as soon as 1.0 is out, there already are a few issues that should be 
> fixed in a later 1.0.1 release, while at the same time we could start 
> working (whoever is interested :-)) in 1.1.
> 
> I haven't got too much experience in this because so far I was always 
> working alone, but is it better to keep 1.0.1 in the trunk/ folder and 
> create a new branch under branches/plog-1.1? Or the other way around? 
> Any first-hand experiences?
> 
> Thanks :-)
> 
> Oscar
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> 




More information about the pLog-svn mailing list