[pLog-svn] TinyMCE and Xinha

nick nizhenyuan ni.hero at gmail.com
Fri Jul 22 15:21:59 GMT 2005


I like the "emotions" feature.

On 7/22/05, Francesc Pla Prats <francesc at qdevel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Wow! Great work Mark!! I agree, TinyMCE is much better than the rest,
> especially when talking about xhtml output, it's quite good and it also
> have the same output in most browsers, the other editors change the
> results depending on which browser are run ... :(
> 
> Francesc.
> 
> PD: could you send us the phone number of your friends (the ones in
> resource gallery ...) :P
> 
> > Hi All:
> >
> > After I finish the plog-xinha migration, I also done plog-tinymce
> > migration...
> >
> > With several days heavy testing, I think I will rejct my previous
> > proposal (use xinha to replace htmlarea), I'll go "use tinymce to
> > replace htmlarea", why?
> >
> > 1. The performace is better (The loading time is shorter the Xinha)
> > 2. The UI is better (The color schema is more fit to pLog)
> > 3. The html generated by tinymce is more xhtml compatible.  (This is
> > what we want for a long time)
> >
> > If you are interesting about this, I will release the patch later ...
> >
> > Of course, I already change all javascript/php/template to follow this
> > change, include the most important "insert resource"
> >
> > Here comes some screen shots ...
> >
> > Mark
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>



More information about the pLog-svn mailing list