[pLog-svn] TinyMCE and Xinha

[Oscar Renalias]

one more question: how about tinymce's ability to use r-t-l languages?

Oscar

On 7/22/05, Oscar Renalias <phunkphorce at gmail.com> wrote:
> is that so? You even implemented the "insert resource" feature? Wow,
> that's nice :)
> 
> By the way, nice pictures you have in your resource centre :D
> 
> Oscar
> 
> On 7/22/05, Mark Wu <markplace at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > After I finish the plog-xinha migration, I also done plog-tinymce
> > migration...
> >
> > With several days heavy testing, I think I will rejct my previous proposal
> > (use xinha to replace htmlarea), I'll go "use tinymce to replace htmlarea",
> > why?
> >
> > 1. The performace is better (The loading time is shorter the Xinha)
> > 2. The UI is better (The color schema is more fit to pLog)
> > 3. The html generated by tinymce is more xhtml compatible.  (This is what we
> > want for a long time)
> >
> > If you are interesting about this, I will release the patch later ...
> >
> > Of course, I already change all javascript/php/template to follow this
> > change, include the most important "insert resource"
> >
> > Here comes some screen shots ...
> >
> > Mark
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> >
> >
>