[pLog-general] Some discussion in drupal

[Mark Wu]

Hi Michael:

Come on :D They have right to do anything la. It is their choice, we should
respect.  

BTW, I plan start the XinHa migrate recently, any suggestions? If you
already develop anything, may I migrate Xinha based on your modification?

I plan to
1. Migrate Xinha to pLog (Check all compatiability)
2. Add media handler into pLog Xinha (so, we can deal with most media files,
include audio and vedio)
3. Add flash handler into pLog Xhinha

Any suggestions?

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
[mailto:plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of michael
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:56 AM
To: plog-general at devel.plogworld.net
Subject: RE: [pLog-general] Some discussion in drupal

I was disgusted with htmlarea dev team... they basically abandoned the
project long ago and just kept leading on the users and plugin developers.  
For one of the more popular scripts out there... they sure didn’t treat the
project and the community with the respect and attention it deserved.

Now, they even locked the message boards.

The main developer of Xinha offered to work together and take htmlarea in
the right direction... but they rejected the offer (though that is denied on
htmlarea's end).  In fact, the Xinha developer was accused of killing the
community by doing the fork.  Ridiculous.



-----Original Message-----
From: plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
[mailto:plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Oscar
Renalias
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 2:50 PM
To: plog-general at devel.plogworld.net
Subject: Re: [pLog-general] Some discussion in drupal

According to the comments in this thread, I think that going with Xinha is
the most reasonable option for us too. We've invested a reasonable amount of
time working with htmlarea, adapting a few things here and there etc, and we
know that now everything works as it should. Xinha is the less disruptive
option and it is an active project so it's the safest option.

On the other hand, I only have harsh words for the developers of htmlarea.
They're free to choose whatever license they wish but now that they've got
tons of beta testing from users, they close the project and leave everyone
out in the cold. That's just so great (though it's only my personal opinion)

Oscar

On 11 Apr 2005, at 20:40, michael wrote:

> Ironically. I started off that topic

>
> http://drupal.org/node/15414
>
>  
>
> I agree
 no question xinha is much improved
 it is why htmlarea axed 
> their own project , officially.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
> [mailto:plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Mark Wu
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 4:02 AM
> To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net; plog-general at devel.plogworld.net
> Subject: [pLog-general] Some discussion in drupal
>
>  
>
> http://drupal.org/node/18567
>
>  
>
> Hi All:
>
>  
>
> Here is the discussion about html editor in drupal.... I think you 
> might be interesting what they think about Xinha, TinyMCE and 
> FCKEditor.
>
>  
>
> Acutally, after I read this thread, I kind of convienced that use 
> Xinha to replace current HTMLArea, seems more reasonable and doable.
>
>  
>
> Mark
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-general mailing list
> pLog-general at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-general

_______________________________________________
pLog-general mailing list
pLog-general at devel.plogworld.net
http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-general

_______________________________________________
pLog-general mailing list
pLog-general at devel.plogworld.net
http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-general