[pLog-general] Some discussion in drupal

[Oscar Renalias]

According to the comments in this thread, I think that going with Xinha 
is the most reasonable option for us too. We've invested a reasonable 
amount of time working with htmlarea, adapting a few things here and 
there etc, and we know that now everything works as it should. Xinha is 
the less disruptive option and it is an active project so it's the 
safest option.

On the other hand, I only have harsh words for the developers of 
htmlarea. They're free to choose whatever license they wish but now 
that they've got tons of beta testing from users, they close the 
project and leave everyone out in the cold. That's just so great 
(though it's only my personal opinion)

Oscar

On 11 Apr 2005, at 20:40, michael wrote:

> Ironically. I started off that topic…
>
> http://drupal.org/node/15414
>
>  
>
> I agree… no question xinha is much improved… it is why htmlarea axed 
> their own project , officially.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net 
> [mailto:plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Mark Wu
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 4:02 AM
> To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net; plog-general at devel.plogworld.net
> Subject: [pLog-general] Some discussion in drupal
>
>  
>
> http://drupal.org/node/18567
>
>  
>
> Hi All:
>
>  
>
> Here is the discussion about html editor in drupal.... I think you 
> might be interesting what they think about Xinha, TinyMCE and 
> FCKEditor.
>
>  
>
> Acutally, after I read this thread, I kind of convienced that use 
> Xinha to replace current HTMLArea, seems more reasonable and doable.
>
>  
>
> Mark
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-general mailing list
> pLog-general at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-general