[pLog-svn] r6688 - plog/branches/lifetype-1.2/class/action
Jon Daley
plogworld at jon.limedaley.com
Wed Jul 2 11:15:00 EDT 2008
Good thought. So, is that an argument to change it back to the
validator instead of filter?
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Reto Hugi wrote:
> Jon Daley wrote:
>> I see your "useless to try again" point. I think it might not be
>> obvious to a non-hacker user why his search terms were invalid.
>>
>
> Unless the user didn't manually enter the search term but clicked on a link
> somewhere (maybe created by an attacker, hoping he is using a pre 1.2.8
> version). Then, the user get's the information, that the link he clicked was
> not well formed.
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
--
Jon Daley
http://jon.limedaley.com
~~
When all else fails, read the instructions.
-- Cann's Axiom
More information about the pLog-svn
mailing list