[pLog-svn] r6088 - plog/branches/lifetype-1.2/class/security
myside at myside.mine.nu
Mon Jan 7 10:23:31 EST 2008
For example: AdminAddUserAction Class Reference
-- NO XML for 3rd party development: I have to personally reference all
public attributes, and all the member functions, from you web based
reference. If I want to perform an action with C# code, I would have to
browse your resources in order to find and define all requirements by
-- YES XML
Your online documentation is indexed for DEVELOPERS whom can parse the
class requirements and create a function -to setup- all the data types,
of any class, a local XML file with references of the purpose, and
virables that would be parsed - all API requirements declared, and just a
call to the function would make this process automatic.
I use VS for my IDE, and call an API resource using my costome function,
references to the XML file are automatically displayed, browsable, and
Imagine defining 8 public attributes for one call that would not be re-usable
code. What a mess!
I am sorry you are having a hard time understanding what I was to
accomplish. But I will not give up, let me know and I will put it in
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mark Wu wrote:
> Yep, I has the same concern, too.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
>> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Jon Daley
>> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 10:36 PM
>> To: LifeType Developer List
>> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r6088 -
>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andy wrote:
>>> As of now, I am taking a long route and entering all API data. I am
>>> doing this for the primary functions, so I know exactly what I am
>>> doing when I need access to these resources.
>> What does your documentation provide that ours doesn't?
>> Perhaps it would be better to added something to the doxygen
>> docs, rather than a separate doc?
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
More information about the pLog-svn