[pLog-svn] __autoload very slow ...

[Mark Wu]

BTW, now I know why Zend's class naming is so ugly. Becasue it is easier to
implement __autoload feature.

They use Zend_ABC_DEF as the class name, it easy for them to ask the
__autoload() function to search ./Zend/ABC/DEF only, it can save a lof of
time.

Mark 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:41 AM
> To: 'LifeType Developer List'
> Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] __autoload very slow ...
> 
> Hi All:
> 
> After the change with rev. 5979 & 5980. I think the 
> performance issue is solved.
> 
> I just test the original lt_include scripts, auto load only 
> scripts and pre-defined class loader map scripts. The  
> performace of  "pre-defined class loader map scripts" is as 
> good as "original lt_include scripts".
> 
> Now, windows lifetype developer can enjoy the autoload features, too.
> 
> Regards, Mark
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> > [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar 
> > Renalias
> > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 8:12 PM
> > To: LifeType Developer List
> > Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] __autoload very slow ...
> > 
> > I was wondering how long it will take people to test this... 
> > Not long :)
> > 
> > We can create a pre-defined array that contains the 
> locations of all 
> > files. Although there's quite many of those, finding a single file 
> > should be pretty quick.
> > 
> > But if it's a performance problem in windows, maybe there 
> isn't much 
> > we can do. All I can say is that I felt no performance increase or 
> > decrease in my OS X laptop, and OS X is not exactly known 
> for being a 
> > speed demon.
> > 
> > On 10/8/07, Mark Wu <markplace at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Actually, I will suggest we revert to the old way +
> > autoload new features.
> > >
> > > So, if developer know lifetype very well, then he can include the 
> > > lifetype related files by him self in front of each scripts.
> > >
> > > If he is a new developer, then he can enjoy the benifit
> > from the new
> > > autoload feature (With the pre-scan scripts array as I 
> suggested) .
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >  ________________________________
> > >  From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:58 PM
> > >
> > > To: 'LifeType Developer List'
> > > Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] __autoload very slow ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I just check the code, there are several stuffs will impact
> > the performance:
> > >
> > > 1. The order of folders:
> > >     - If the file is locate in the last folder, then the
> > autload have
> > > to check all the folders
> > >
> > > 2. The number of folders:
> > >     -There are about 110 folders in the folder list array.  
> > I think it
> > > is too much folders for autoload
> > >
> > > 3. The file I/O
> > >     - It seems the file I/O under windws is much worse then 
> > > Unix/Linux, that why Oscar feel no big difference with autoload.
> > >
> > > For adapt the new autoload feature in lifetype with such
> > big quantity
> > > of folders, I think we should try to use the same skill 
> we used in 
> > > script checks.
> > >
> > > To generate a $include_script[$key] = $value; file for autoload.
> > >
> > > Then we just use array_key_exist to check the $key exist or
> > not. Then
> > > include the file.
> > >
> > > It will save a lot of time.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >  ________________________________
> > >  From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:36 PM
> > > To: 'LifeType Developer List'
> > > Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] __autoload very slow ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I forgot to say this is the result of admin.php?op=newPost
> > >
> > > You can see there are over 7700 function call of file_exists().
> > >
> > > If each file_exists call() takes 1 ms. It will takes 15 seconds ..
> > >
> > > It is so amazing.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >  ________________________________
> > >  From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:23 PM
> > > To: 'LifeType Developer List'
> > > Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] __autoload very slow ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > I just attached my profiling file and the result with
> > wincachegrined. 
> > > You can see the bottle neck is in file_exists.
> > >
> > > It takks about 12 seconds.
> > >
> > > wow ...
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  ________________________________
> > >  From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> > > [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Mark Wu
> > > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 4:16 PM
> > > To: 'LifeType Developer List'
> > > Subject: [pLog-svn] __autoload very slow ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Oscar:
> > >
> > > I just test the new autoload under windows, the performace
> > is very bad under
> > > windows ( apache 2.2.4, PHP5 5.2.3 & Mysql 5.0)
> > >
> > > In original lt_include version, every request can finished
> > within less 1-2
> > > seconds.
> > >
> > > But, in new autoload version, every request takes almost
> > 25-35 seconds to
> > > show up the page ...
> > >
> > > I check the cpu loading, it always in 100%. It seems PHP
> > just try search the
> > > include files recursivelly
> > >
> > > It is really terrible ....
> > >
> > > Do I need to do any special setup in PHP.ini for autoload?
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pLog-svn mailing list
> > > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > > http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn