[pLog-svn] r6088 - plog/branches/lifetype-1.2/class/security

[Paul Westbrook]

Hello,
   That should be fine.  But in revision 5918 it looks like it is
intentional that the Bayesian filter runs first.

--Paul

On 11/30/07, Oscar Renalias <oscar at renalias.net> wrote:
>
> So can this issue be closed by placing the Bayesian filter at the end
> of the pipeline chain?
>
> On Nov 30, 2007, at 6:48 AM, Jon Daley wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Mark Wu wrote:
> >> Why can't we just put the bayesian filter in last order? it seems
> >> solve this
> >> problem easier.
> >       Does that fix everything?  It is certainly the easiest (coding and
> > performance) wise.
> >       With my thinking it seems like that fixes it - at least for now,
> > because we don't have any other plugins that would use the inputs of
> > others.  And we can maybe do Mark's priority idea if we ever need
> > that sort of thing.
> >       As long as it works for Paul's stuff, I think that sounds good.
> So,
> > then we should take Mark's rev 6088 or whatever it is and use that,
> > but modify it to pass in the previouslyRejected flag, and then put
> > the bayesian at the end.
> >
> >> BTW,  most lifetype installations in CJK site does rely on Bayesian
> >> Filter to protect the spam attack. Because the tokenize algorithm
> >> can't separate CJK into each atomic token. We don't use stop words
> >> and "white space" to seperate a paragraph into "word".
> >       I am not sure what you are saying.  It seems like you are saying
> > the tokenizer doesn't work, so then it seems that the bayesian
> > filter wouldn't be very good at all...
> >
> >       Well, it's been 10 minutes since I read your idea of simply
> putting
> > the bayesian filter at the end, and haven't come up with a reason
> > why it won't work.  So, probably good.  Do you want to do it, or me?
> >
> > --
> > Jon Daley
> > http://jon.limedaley.com/
> >
> > Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong.
> > -- Oscar Wilde_______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://limedaley.com/pipermail/plog-svn/attachments/20071130/d978ed76/attachment.htm