[pLog-svn] lt_include

[Jon Daley]

 	Do you have a way to benchmark whether it is better to have the 
_once or not?

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Oscar Renalias wrote:
> Yes, we could try that...
>
> On 3/12/07, Jon Daley <plogworld at jon.limedaley.com> wrote:
>>         I hadn't ever looked at lt_include until just now.  Should we be
>> calling include() rather than include_once() in lt_include?
>>
>>
>> function lt_include( $filename ){
>>    if(!isset($GLOBALS['included_files'][$filename] )) {
>>      include_once($filename);
>>      $GLOBALS['included_files'][$filename] = TRUE;
>>    }
>> }
>>
>>         We don't need the _once part, and I would expect that include() is
>> faster than include_once()?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>

-- 
Jon Daley
http://jon.limedaley.com/

I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them.
-- George Bush Sr.