[pLog-svn] spammers...
Jon Daley
plogworld at jon.limedaley.com
Fri Jun 8 10:03:03 EDT 2007
No, actually. It was a nice test. I can't see any difference
from normal:
http://limedaley.com/mrtg/limedaley.cpu.html
(note, most current time is on the left - see the red arrow pointing to
the left, that confuses people lots of times)
The largest peak of email (161 per minute, sustained for maybe 10 minutes)
was at 11:20PM last night. And then there are the regular nightly task
jumps, but that is it.
So, it helps verify my theory that hosting email doesn't cause much load,
and my IT guys at my part-time job are crazy for needing multiple servers
for hosting just the email.
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Oscar Renalias wrote:
> Did it cause much load on the server?
>
> On 6/8/07, Jon Daley <plogworld at jon.limedaley.com> wrote:
>> Spammers have been trying to have fun - ~6600 emails sent
>> in the last 12 hours to random addresses @lifetype.net.
>>
>> --
>> Jon Daley
>> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>>
>> Satan only gives you the seeds for sin, not the whole plant.
>> He leaves the growing up to us.
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
--
Jon Daley
http://jon.limedaley.com/
Proofreading is more effective after publication.
-- Barker
More information about the pLog-svn
mailing list