[pLog-svn] spammers...

Jon Daley plogworld at jon.limedaley.com
Fri Jun 8 10:03:03 EDT 2007


 	No, actually.  It was a nice test.  I can't see any difference 
from normal:

http://limedaley.com/mrtg/limedaley.cpu.html

(note, most current time is on the left - see the red arrow pointing to 
the left, that confuses people lots of times)

The largest peak of email (161 per minute, sustained for maybe 10 minutes) 
was at 11:20PM last night.  And then there are the regular nightly task 
jumps, but that is it.

So, it helps verify my theory that hosting email doesn't cause much load, 
and my IT guys at my part-time job are crazy for needing multiple servers 
for hosting just the email.

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Oscar Renalias wrote:
> Did it cause much load on the server?
>
> On 6/8/07, Jon Daley <plogworld at jon.limedaley.com> wrote:
>>         Spammers have been trying to have fun - ~6600 emails sent
>> in the last 12 hours to random addresses @lifetype.net.
>>
>> --
>> Jon Daley
>> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>>
>> Satan only gives you the seeds for sin, not the whole plant.
>> He leaves the growing up to us.
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>

-- 
Jon Daley
http://jon.limedaley.com/

Proofreading is more effective after publication.
-- Barker


More information about the pLog-svn mailing list