[pLog-svn] r4667 - plog/branches

[Oscar Renalias]

I guess that sounds reasonable.

On 2 Feb 2007, at 14:19, Jon Daley wrote:

>  	Can I recommend (if I haven't already), that we switch the
> branching style used, when we go to 1.2?
> I am thinking it is simpler to have a 1.2 branch like we already  
> have, and
> don't create any more branches for 1.2, but just tag as  
> appropriate.  I
> think it would be simpler to manage, and less switching around.
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, oscar at devel.lifetype.net wrote:
>
>> Author: oscar
>> Date: 2007-02-02 04:50:04 -0500 (Fri, 02 Feb 2007)
>> New Revision: 4667
>>
>> Added:
>>   plog/branches/lifetype-1.1.6/
>> Log:
>> New branch for LifeType 1.1.6, in case it's needed
>>
>>
>> Copied: plog/branches/lifetype-1.1.6 (from rev 4666, plog/tags/ 
>> lifetype-1.1.5)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
>
> -- 
> Jon Daley
> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>
> If you don't know the truth, you will believe anything.
> -- Eric Simmons
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://limedaley.com/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>