[pLog-svn] r5348 - in plog/branches/lifetype-1.2:

[Jon Daley]

 	By my tests (using `time php index.php`)
Show that lt_include (with a cached page) is 1.8% faster than just plain 
include_once, and if I use include instead of include_once inside of 
lt_include, I get another .7% increase.  So, not a ton, but a little 
faster.  I assume that this will result in more errors - when people don't 
use lt_include, so maybe we want to default it to include_once, but leave 
a note on the wiki for people who are trying to squeeze every last bit of 
performance out of it.
 	I think I will leave it in for now, and see what happens when you 
guys update your code, and if it is too annoying for a small gain, we can 
take it out.

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Jon Daley wrote:
> I removed almost all require, require_once, include and include_once calls
> in our code.