[pLog-svn] LT 1.1 ready?

Oscar Renalias oscar at renalias.net
Tue Sep 5 15:29:20 GMT 2006


If we ever implement direct access to files, I guess that the only  
way to keep nice URLs is by actually saving files with the same name  
that they were uploaded and using folders as albums. There really is  
no other way around it I think.


On 5 Sep 2006, at 16:57, Jon Daley wrote:

> 	Yes, I think directly is the only way.  I played around with some  
> other methods of reading and outputting the files, but with very  
> little difference in cpu load.
> 	It is too bad, because being able to have nicer URLs and protect  
> certain graphics easily is nice.
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Oscar Renalias wrote:
>> Yeah I've been thinking about that... And I guess that the only
>> possible solution is to serve those files directly via the web server
>> instead of via resserver.php.
>>
>> On 9/5/06, Mark Wu <markplace at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> One small thing.
>>> For overall performance, the 1.1 is better then 1.0. But the  
>>> resserver.php
>>> still the slowest script in 1.1...
>>> Use http_cache can improve some performance. But not enough ...
>>> Mark
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:32 PM
>>> > To: 'plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net'
>>> > Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] LT 1.1 ready?
>>> >
>>> > I have run 1.1 in http://www.starblog.com.tw for 2 months..
>>> >
>>> > There is no big errors. So, I think 1.1 is stable enough and
>>> > ready to release.
>>> >
>>> > Mark
>>> >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
>>> > > [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar
>>> > > Renalias
>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:27 AM
>>> > > To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>> > > Subject: [pLog-svn] LT 1.1 ready?
>>> > >
>>> > > Just wondering if everybody's happy with the current status  
>>> of LT
>>> > > 1.1... it's probably about time to release it :-)
>>> > >
>>> > > There are no major glaring issues and we'll get working on
>>> > > 1.1.1 as soon as 1.1 is out of the door, so there's still  
>>> time for
>>> > > extra translations and additions if there's anybody working on
>>> > > something.
>>> > >
>>> > > Oscar
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > pLog-svn mailing list
>>> > > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>> > > http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pLog-svn mailing list
>>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>> _______________________________________________
>> pLog-svn mailing list
>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>>
>
> -- 
> Jon Daley
> http://jon.limedaley.com/
>
> Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
> Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible,
> you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
> -- Brian Kernighan
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>



More information about the pLog-svn mailing list