[pLog-svn] r4086 - in plog/trunk/class: . action action/admi...

Oscar Renalias oscar at renalias.net
Thu Oct 5 07:01:12 GMT 2006


While testing this in another computer I just realized that i forgot
to commit the code for the lt_include() function... Sorry about that,
I'll do it later.

On 10/5/06, Reto Hugi <plog at hugi.to> wrote:
> On 04.10.2006 22:39, Oscar Renalias wrote:
> >> Benchmarks coming soon.
> >
> > This does seem to make quite a difference. I've generated a small
> > test script with 25 requests and executed it with the code before and
> > after the changes, and although 25 requests is statistically not a
> > very representative group, I think it's enough to give us an idea...
> > as most of the requests ran between 40% to 100% faster. This could
> > also be because PHP has never worked too fast in OS X, so probably
> > the speed increase in systems like Linux will be smaller. But I
> > suppose that a small speed increase is better than no speed increase
> > at all :)
>
> congratulations on this! I didn't even know this could have an impact on
>  performance. I assumed that php would manage includes more efficiently
> than any scripted loader... cool.
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>


More information about the pLog-svn mailing list