[pLog-svn] resserver usage

[Jon Daley]

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Reto Hugi wrote:
> another, but IMO not useful option (I'm just brainstorming):
> what if lifetype is redirecting to another, more light weight script
> that accepts the nice filename/ugly filename mapping and delivers the
> file to the browser?
> There would still be a 30x redirect and LT is done, but the client gets
> a nice filename... efficiency? don't know...

 	I don't think that helps anything, does it?  What is different 
about this other script?  Less memory usage?