[pLog-svn] r3385 - inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin

[Mark Wu]

Hi Oscar:

For promotion and marketing purpose, I think we need to consider change all
"plog" to "lifetype",...

Not only all links, but also our codes ... We also have to ask our user to
change it ... Help them upgrade to lifetype 1.1

I know it is stupid to do it, but kindly take a look at this page:

http://google.com/trends?q=Wordpress%2C+lifetype%2C+plog&ctab=0&geo=all&date
=all 

See what google trends tell us ... :p

** But maybe not  now, maybe postpone to 1.2...  Because I am afriad these
change will make the current code unstable :(

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net 
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of 
> Oscar Renalias
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 11:34 PM
> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3385 - 
> inplog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin
> 
> No need to change PLOG_CLASS_PATH to LT_CLASS_PATH or 
> anything like that. It's just a constant and changing it 
> would only bring cosmetic improvements.
> 
> And the same with the locale keys.
> 
> On 12 May 2006, at 08:01, Mark Wu wrote:
> 
> > One more things ....
> >
> > Are we planing to change all plog_class_path to lt_class_path ...
> >
> > And replace all 'plog' strings to 'lifetype' or 'LT'?
> >
> > Should all these change done in 1.1?
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> >> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar 
> >> Renalias
> >> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 12:43 PM
> >> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> >> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3385 - in
> >> plog/trunk:class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin
> >>
> >> I agree with 2, I disagree with 1 and I am hesitating about 3.
> >>
> >> Why do we need yet another request parser/generator? I think
> >> 5 of them is way too much. I would only accept this new method to 
> >> replace one of the ones that we currently have.
> >>
> >> Regarding 3, it will add extra code to the wizard, even 
> though I can 
> >> see its usefulness for people who don't understand English. On the 
> >> other hand, it's something that has never been requested...
> >>
> >> On 12 May 2006, at 06:27, Mark Wu wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Oscar:
> >>>
> >>> Sure. :)
> >>>
> >>> But there are still some features that we planed add to
> >> 1.1, but still
> >>> lack in current trunk. And I hope we can finish it before we star 
> >>> alpha testing.
> >>> (I suppose we just in development testing? Or,do I make any
> >>> misunderstand?)
> >>>
> >>> 1. Lss's new request parser. It can allow user to use the pretty 
> >>> request url and custom url in "AllowOverride none"
> >> environment. It is
> >>> vert useful is use VHS.
> >>> http://bugs.lifetype.net/view.php?id=790
> >>> 2. New top level menu, plugins. To make our plugin 
> structures more 
> >>> clean
> >>> http://bugs.lifetype.net/view.php?id=697
> >>> 3. Multi-Language installation.
> >>>
> >>> Will we implement all of them? Or just freeze the function now?
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
> >>>> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Oscar 
> >>>> Renalias
> >>>> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 6:47 AM
> >>>> To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> >>>> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] r3385 - in plog/trunk:
> >>>> class/action/adminjs/tinymcejs/ui locale templates/admin
> >>>>
> >>>> Autosaving is an awesome feature but can we stop developing new 
> >>>> things for 1.1, pretty please?
> >>>>
> >>>> We can't ask people to beta test something that is being
> >> modified on
> >>>> a daily basis as we can't be sure about how many new
> >> problems we're
> >>>> introducing with every new line of code.
> >>>>
> >>>> 1.1 is shaping up to be a great release but we have to work on 
> >>>> stabilizing it first, and that's what our top priority
> >> should be at
> >>>> the moment.
> >>>>
> >>>> If there is nothing to fix and you don't know what to do,
> >> say so and
> >>>> we'll assign you some work :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Oscar
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11 May 2006, at 21:37, Mark Wu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Some behavior change in autosave:
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> pLog-svn mailing list
> >>>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> >>>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> pLog-svn mailing list
> >>> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> >>> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pLog-svn mailing list
> >> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> >> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> > http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn