[pLog-svn] r2823 - plog/trunk/class/dao/userdata
Jon Daley
plogworld at jon.limedaley.com
Fri Jan 20 14:33:01 GMT 2006
I understand about reverting for testing. I believe the reason
that adding it works is because baseuserprovider is included from
adminaction somehow, probably through some long path. But, both
adminaction and baseuserprovider need the include.
I think we removed a lot of includes to make the parsing quicker,
but we will probably run into lots of problems where adminaction is now
dependent on blogstatus through baseuserprovider, and if baseuserprovider
is ever changed, it will break adminaction. Kind of scary.
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Mark Wu wrote:
> Yep, it is solved after I add that (in svn 2828)... I just don't know
> "why"... Because the original code (2822) should work (in logically), but
> actually it does not work....
>
> I mean, if you want to test you have to revert it back ... :D
More information about the pLog-svn
mailing list