[pLog-svn] r3251 - plog/trunk/class/security

paul at westbrooks.org paul at westbrooks.org
Tue Apr 18 15:58:50 GMT 2006


Hello,
   No problem.  I will check this in tonight when I get home.  I will also
check in changes to the plugins so that by default they don't do
anything when run on messages that have already been rejected.  (The
bayesian filter already handles this.)

--Paul

> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Paul Westbrook wrote:
>> 1) By running all of the filters again, we can proactively train filters
>> on
>> messages that have been blocked by other filters.
>>
>> 2) By running only the filters that ran originally, gives them a chance
>> to
>> clean up.
>>
>>   This fixes the problem that was happening with the bayesian filter,
>> where
>> the message was deleted after being mistrained.  In this case there
>> wasn't a
>> way to retrain the bayesian filter.
>  	Right.
>
>> I am not tied to one of these two options.
>  	Yeah, me either - I just thought that it should be discussed, so
> people know what it is going to do.  I would lean towards running all
> plugins, as they might want to be notified about something being spam.
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
> http://devel.lifetype.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
>



More information about the pLog-svn mailing list