[pLog-svn] moo.fx vs. prototype

[Mark Wu]

Hi Glen:
 
Before I choose ajax effect library, I try severl libraries. Rico,
Scriptaculus, moofx, ...
 
I choose Rico becasue it has the best UI effect. And moo.fx is not so good
at that time.
 
Anyway, I'll take a look again.
 
Mark


  _____  

From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net
[mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.lifetype.net] On Behalf Of Glen Stansberry
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 4:52 AM
To: plog-svn at devel.lifetype.net
Subject: [pLog-svn] moo.fx vs. prototype


I know I've talked about this before in the forums, but I'm in the process
of switching over from rico to moo.fx., because of the major reduction in
size.  Rico and Prototype combined are over 140kb (on my local machine), and
the moo.fx package is right around 13kb. I've only been able to replace Rico
thus far, but it's shown a nice increase in load times since then. (Trimming
about 85kb will do that ;) )

I think this question is probably directed at Mark, but can you use the
moo.ajax and prototype.lite (included in the moo.fx package) to replace the
full prototype completely?  I'm guessing prototype's purpose is for the
auto-adding of categories.

In case you need to look, here's the documentation for moo.fx:
http://moofx.mad4milk.net/documentation/

Glen


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http:// devel.lifetype.net/pipermail/plog-svn/attachments/20060411/58348f1e/attachment-0001.html