[pLog-svn] Which one should I use?

[Mark Wu]

Hi Jon & Oscar:

I see, I think I got confused. Thanks ... I will commit those bugs patch to
/branches/plog-1.0.2 :D 

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net 
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of 
> Oscar Renalias
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 5:36 PM
> To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] Which one should I use?
> 
> To clear the confusion:
> 
> - You should never commit to a folder under tags/. Svn is not 
> going to prevent you from doing it because svn has no concept 
> of "tags", while cvs did. Tags in svn are just a copy a 
> source code tree at a certain time and as a self-imposed 
> rule, we never make changes to tags. Of course we could 
> always remember that 1.0.2-beta corresponds to revision 2454 
> of the repository, but marking it with a tag is always easier :)
> 
> - The 1.0.2 *branch* is still open for bug-fixes. After all, 
> what we released last weekend is just a beta (and it was 
> tagged as "plog-1.0.2-beta" instead of "plog-1.0.2") so it is 
> allowed to make changes. Small changes, if possible... I also 
> a couple of changes myself, by the way.
> 
> - Once we are happy wiht 1.0.2, we'll make another copy from
> branches/plog-1.0.2 to tags/plog-1.0.2 or even 
> tags/plog-1.0.2-beta2 and release a second beta if we find it 
> necessary.
> 
> - In case you were wondering,  regarding merging 1.0.2 with 
> 1.1, all we need to do in the future is merge only 
> branches/plog-1.0.2 from revision 2xxx onwards, so that we 
> don't merge the same stuff twice.
> 
> Hope this is clear now :)
> 
> Oscar
> 
> On 9/20/05, Mark Wu <markplace at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Because in 1.0.1, we don't have a tag/10.1-beta ..... We 
> just rlease 
> > it from branchs/1.0.1. After 1-2 week test, we releast it 
> as official 
> > package and copy it to tag/1.0.1 ...
> > 
> > That's why I don't understand why we have a new tag/1.0.2-beta, is 
> > that mean we have to commit the later 1.0.2 beta bugs fix to 
> > /tag/1.0.2-beta or we still commit those bugs fix to 
> /branches/1.0.2.
> > 
> > Mark
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark Wu [mailto:markplace at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:02 PM
> > > To: 'plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net'
> > > Subject: RE: [pLog-svn] Which one should I use?
> > >
> > > Just those bugs list in bugs.plogworld.org.
> > >
> > > BTW, I don't understand. Do you mean we can't do bug fix in beta 
> > > period? That's why I ask whick repository to commit
> > >
> > > http://devel.plogworld.net/svn/plog/plog/branches/plog-1.0.2
> > >
> > > Or
> > >
> > > http://devel.plogworld.net/svn/plog/plog/tags/plog-1.0.2-beta
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
> > > > [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Jon 
> > > > Daley
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:40 PM
> > > > To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > > > Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] Which one should I use?
> > > >
> > > >     You aren't supposed to check into tags, pretty much ever.
> > > > Will a release be made either way?  How critical is the bug?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Mark Wu wrote:
> > > > > Hi Oscar:
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to patch some bug fix for 1.0.2 I fixed 
> yesterday, which 
> > > > > branchs should I use?
> > > > >
> > > > > This one:
> > > > http://devel.plogworld.net/svn/plog/plog/branches/plog-1.0.2
> > > > > or 
> http://devel.plogworld.net/svn/plog/plog/tags/plog-1.0.2-beta
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > **************************************
> > > > Jon Daley
> > > > http://jon.limedaley.com/plog/
> > > >
> > > > All truth passes through 3 stages.  First, it is ridiculed.
> > > > Second, it is violently opposed.  Third, it is accepted 
> as being 
> > > > self-evident.
> > > > -- Arthur Schopenhauer
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > pLog-svn mailing list
> > > > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > > > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn