[pLog-svn] r2068 - plog/branches/plog-1.0.1

[Benjamin Krause]

Allan Sun wrote:
> ohohoh~~~~
>  
> Gentlemen~~~ Calm down~~~~
>  
> We are a team aren't we? And we do understand we are a distributed team, 
> less communication would always lead such kind of misunderstanding, but 
> we need to respect everybody's work don't we?
>  
> I think Francesc did spent a lot of time on investigating his memory 
> usage hack, so IF the other members can point this out more gentlly I 
> think that would be much easier for him to accept this reverse ( 
> Everybody hates their code being reversed right?!).
>  
> Let's put it in the bug tracker and let more people to decide how we can 
> implement this would be a better way, especially at the time we are 
> going to have an official release.

Hey Alan,

We're calm.. Maybe i should have placed a smily at the end of my post ;)

And I think we do agree that increasing the memory_limit on sites where
that's possible is a good idea. but we cannot expect to be able to raise
the memory limit on the fly.

so oscars solution to include the line but as a comment is fine with me.
i do strongly agree with francesc, that we need to address these memory
issues as soon as possible. we need to discuss the best way to do it.

Maybe we should open up a thread at the forum to discuss the next steps.

Ben