[pLog-svn] plog 1.0.1 and 1.1

Su Baochen subaochen at 126.com
Thu Mar 31 07:20:05 GMT 2005


Vote +1 for Francesc Pla Prats's suggestion.


ÔÚ 2005-03-30ÈýµÄ 21:52 +0200£¬Francesc Pla PratsдµÀ£º
> It might seem the same, but it's not, I insist the right one is use the
> trunk for main development and every release have its own branch. Here
> are a couple of howto of revision control systems talking about
> branches ...
> 
> http://www.thathost.com/wincvs-howto/cvsdoc/cvs_5.html#SEC55
> http://software.ericsink.com/scm/scm_branches.html
> 
> If you're still not convinced I'll search a couple of tones of docs to
> prove it :D
> 
> Francesc.
> 
> 
> > it's all the same to me... But perhaps as a user I would expect to get 
> > the most recent development version when fetching the plog/trunk/.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> 





More information about the pLog-svn mailing list