[pLog-svn] plog 1.0.1 and 1.1
Su Baochen
subaochen at 126.com
Thu Mar 31 07:20:05 GMT 2005
Vote +1 for Francesc Pla Prats's suggestion.
ÔÚ 2005-03-30ÈýµÄ 21:52 +0200£¬Francesc Pla PratsдµÀ£º
> It might seem the same, but it's not, I insist the right one is use the
> trunk for main development and every release have its own branch. Here
> are a couple of howto of revision control systems talking about
> branches ...
>
> http://www.thathost.com/wincvs-howto/cvsdoc/cvs_5.html#SEC55
> http://software.ericsink.com/scm/scm_branches.html
>
> If you're still not convinced I'll search a couple of tones of docs to
> prove it :D
>
> Francesc.
>
>
> > it's all the same to me... But perhaps as a user I would expect to get
> > the most recent development version when fetching the plog/trunk/.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
More information about the pLog-svn
mailing list