[pLog-svn] plog 1.0.1 and 1.1

[Oscar Renalias]

On 30 Mar 2005, at 19:52, Benjamin Krause wrote:

> Oscar Renalias wrote:
>> as soon as 1.0 is out, there already are a few issues that should be 
>> fixed in a later 1.0.1 release, while at the same time we could start 
>> working (whoever is interested :-)) in 1.1.
>> I haven't got too much experience in this because so far I was always 
>> working alone, but is it better to keep 1.0.1 in the trunk/ folder 
>> and create a new branch under branches/plog-1.1? Or the other way 
>> around? Any first-hand experiences?
>
> hey ..
>
> i'd keep the 1.0.1 in the trunk .. afaik 1.1 will include new 
> features, so it's better to have a new 1.1 branch..

I think it's all the same to me.

Subversion supports merging a branch into another just fine, right? I'm 
thinking that once 1.0.1 is ready, all the changes from the 1.1 branch 
should be merged into the main trunk (and I wouldn't like to do the 
merging manually)

>
> btw.. anyone ever thought about an image verification for comments?

Mark's authimage plugin does just that :-)

Oscar