[pLog-svn] about plog perfomance

[nick nizhenyuan]

Got it, thanks:P


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Oscar Renalias <phunkphorce at gmail.com>
Date: Aug 17, 2005 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] about plog perfomance
To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net


do we really need to discuss about this again?

PHP's architecture will penalize heavily OOPed applications (specially
those like plog that like to load lots of objects), that's a fact and
there's nothing we can do about it. We know about this, we have been
living with it for a while and we're not going to change it.

If people prefer to go back to the stone age of PHP programming where
the same SQL query is copy+pasted in 15 different places, and where
html code is all mixed with php code, feel free to try wordpr^H^H I
mean, other scripts :-)

Oscar

On 8/17/05, nick nizhenyuan <ni.hero at gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried the plog1.0 code with DB cache, the perfomance improved very much.
>
> >From my site, thousands of people get to know about plog, including
> www.newradio.cn.
>
> So some people discussed with me about the Plog, the conclusion is
> that plog has a very great MVC structure which make it strong and
> extentable.
>
> But we also wonder that, will this kind of structure make it slower?
>
> How do you think? Anyone tried to compare/analyse the perfomance of
> plog which adopt a fully OOP and MVC structure?
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>
_______________________________________________
pLog-svn mailing list
pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn