[pLog-svn] Merge plans for 1.0.2 to 1.1

Oscar Renalias phunkphorce at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 09:39:55 GMT 2005


I would like to merge 1.0.2 with 1.1 as soon as the former is
released. I know you can do "partial" merges with svn (as in merging
only from rev X to rev Y) but I'd rather not mess around too much with
that...

In any case, I wouldn't be too worried about 1.1 not having the latest
bug fixes. It's quite broken at the moment so these latest fixes, even
being excellent, will be useless there...

Oscar 

On 8/13/05, nick nizhenyuan <ni.hero at gmail.com> wrote:
> You can say that again.
> I even can't wait it. I hope I can add new features on the formal code
> rathe than a version merged by myself------so we can share the work
> together:)
> 
> 
> On 8/12/05, Mark Wu <markplace at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think the merge process is getting urgent   .... The best time to merge
> > the the 1.0.2 back to 1.1 should be after 1.0.2 release .
> >
> > We have 3 development branches at this moment, and it really get things more
> > complicated:
> >
> > 1. 1.02 Development Branch - with a lot of bug fix and new features not in
> > 1.1
> > 2. 1.1-ben - with complete DB-cache implement to our pLog DAO and with a lot
> > of features not in 1.0.2
> > 3. 1.1-daochanges - with Oscar's enhencement of 1.1-ben
> >
> > The problem of 2,3 is they don't have a bugs fix and new features in 1.0.2
> > since last merge (3 months ago, I guess).
> >
> > Maybe next time when we want to fork a development branch, we need to limit
> > the scope of changes. For example, the 1.1-ben branch only limit to DB-Cache
> > implementation. I think it should be easier to manage.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
> > > [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of
> > > Paul Westbrook
> > > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 2:55 AM
> > > To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > > Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] Merge plans for 1.0.2 to 1.1
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >     Either way sounds fine.  I agree with you about the
> > > longer that we stay on 1.0.2, the quicker it will come out.
> > > The only downside to this is that fixes will continue to be
> > > made while we are on it.  What is the planned release date for 1.0.2?
> > >
> > > --Paul
> > >
> > >
> > > On Aug 11, 2005, at 3:04 AM, Jon Daley wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Paul Westbrook wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>   What are the plans for merging the 1.0.2 tree to 1.1?
> > > >>
> > > >     I would imagine the current plan is to do like we did
> > > for 1.0.1,
> > > > that everything will get merged once 1.0.2 is out.  But, I
> > > know what
> > > > you mean, that it would be nice to check out 1.1, but you
> > > don't want
> > > > to "downgrade" all the features/bug fixes of 1.0.2.
> > > >     It is definitely the wrong thing to migrate some of the changes
> > > > from 1.0.2 to 1.1.  I imagine that makes it difficult to merge
> > > > everything later.
> > > >     I think if we kept track of the date/revision of the merge, we
> > > > could merge over everything in 1.0.2 up to now to 1.1, and then get
> > > > the rest of 1.0.2 when it is released.
> > > >
> > > >     I have thought that the longer I stay on 1.0.2, the
> > > quicker it is
> > > > likely for 1.0.2 to come out, since I will have extra motivation to
> > > > get things done.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> I would like to try out 1.1, I don't think that a lot of the bugs
> > > >> that I have fixed in the 1.0.2 tree that fix PHP5 problems have
> > > >> been merged there yet.
> > > >>
> > > >     Correct.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **************************************************************
> > > > *         Jon Daley         *   The sooner you fall behind,  *
> > > > *                           *  the more time you'll have to  *
> > > > * http://jon.limedaley.com/ *            catch up.           *
> > > > **************************************************************
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > pLog-svn mailing list
> > > > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > > > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Paul Westbrook
> > > paul at westbrooks.org
> > > <http://www.westbrooks.org>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-svn mailing list
> pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
>



More information about the pLog-svn mailing list