[pLog-svn] Merge plans for 1.0.2 to 1.1

Mark Wu markplace at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 02:49:07 GMT 2005


I think the merge process is getting urgent   .... The best time to merge
the the 1.0.2 back to 1.1 should be after 1.0.2 release .

We have 3 development branches at this moment, and it really get things more
complicated:

1. 1.02 Development Branch - with a lot of bug fix and new features not in
1.1
2. 1.1-ben - with complete DB-cache implement to our pLog DAO and with a lot
of features not in 1.0.2
3. 1.1-daochanges - with Oscar's enhencement of 1.1-ben 

The problem of 2,3 is they don't have a bugs fix and new features in 1.0.2
since last merge (3 months ago, I guess). 

Maybe next time when we want to fork a development branch, we need to limit
the scope of changes. For example, the 1.1-ben branch only limit to DB-Cache
implementation. I think it should be easier to manage.

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net 
> [mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of 
> Paul Westbrook
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 2:55 AM
> To: plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] Merge plans for 1.0.2 to 1.1
> 
> Hello,
>     Either way sounds fine.  I agree with you about the 
> longer that we stay on 1.0.2, the quicker it will come out.  
> The only downside to this is that fixes will continue to be 
> made while we are on it.  What is the planned release date for 1.0.2?
> 
> --Paul
> 
> 
> On Aug 11, 2005, at 3:04 AM, Jon Daley wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Paul Westbrook wrote:
> >
> >>   What are the plans for merging the 1.0.2 tree to 1.1?
> >>
> >     I would imagine the current plan is to do like we did 
> for 1.0.1, 
> > that everything will get merged once 1.0.2 is out.  But, I 
> know what 
> > you mean, that it would be nice to check out 1.1, but you 
> don't want 
> > to "downgrade" all the features/bug fixes of 1.0.2.
> >     It is definitely the wrong thing to migrate some of the changes 
> > from 1.0.2 to 1.1.  I imagine that makes it difficult to merge 
> > everything later.
> >     I think if we kept track of the date/revision of the merge, we 
> > could merge over everything in 1.0.2 up to now to 1.1, and then get 
> > the rest of 1.0.2 when it is released.
> >
> >     I have thought that the longer I stay on 1.0.2, the 
> quicker it is 
> > likely for 1.0.2 to come out, since I will have extra motivation to 
> > get things done.
> >
> >
> >> I would like to try out 1.1, I don't think that a lot of the bugs  
> >> that I have fixed in the 1.0.2 tree that fix PHP5 problems have  
> >> been merged there yet.
> >>
> >     Correct.
> >
> >
> > **************************************************************
> > *         Jon Daley         *   The sooner you fall behind,  *
> > *                           *  the more time you'll have to  *
> > * http://jon.limedaley.com/ *            catch up.           *
> > **************************************************************
> > _______________________________________________
> > pLog-svn mailing list
> > pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
> > http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Paul Westbrook
> paul at westbrooks.org
> <http://www.westbrooks.org>
> 
> 
> 




More information about the pLog-svn mailing list