[pLog-svn] Branch plog-1.1-ben - callgraph 1.1-ben

[Mark Wu]

I agree with Ben :D

I don't like OO very much until I join this project ..... OO for me is too
complicated, but Oscar made pLog code so .."beautiful", and let me can know
how beautiful of OO so easily :D

I even think If I can seperate the MVC core of pLog, then I can use it to
develop my own application. Acutally, because pLog , now I can know what
"Prado" and "Ruby and rails" doing :D

Regards, Mark 

-----Original Message-----
From: plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
[mailto:plog-svn-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Benjamin Krause
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:59 PM
To: oscar at renalias.net; plog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
Subject: Re: [pLog-svn] Branch plog-1.1-ben - callgraph 1.1-ben

Oscar Renalias wrote:
> in any case, we're talking like our current architecture is an utter 
> failure and I think that it is *not*. It has worked so far and it will 
> continue working fine in the future... it might need some improvements 
> here and there but that's part of the software development cycle.
> Perhaps it has outgrown itself but that's why somebody with some spare 
> time has decided to get into it and see what can be fixed... :-)
> 
> As far as uncached pages is concerned, the performance will be exactly 
> as it was before. The only thing we can improve is the amount of sql 
> queries needed.

i can only repeat myself.. this is the best code i've seen so far in a php
project.. and the framework is working really great.. its just the wrong
language :)

i really like your code.. i wouldn't have joined this project if your code
wasn't that cleanly structurized and beautiful.. so please be lenient if you
think we're talking to rough about your baby :)

and i'm very confident we'll get this code (in the current architecture)
running at a good performance.

Ben
_______________________________________________
pLog-svn mailing list
pLog-svn at devel.plogworld.net
http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-svn