[pLog-general] Your thoughts on 1.1

[Oscar Renalias]

why do we need this feature? I don't think it's that useful...
Besides, it can easily be implemented as a plugin that would be 100%
integrated with the admin interface.

Guys, think that now that we've got the basic framework working, all
these perhaps-not-so-useful-features can be built as additions on top
of it as plugin. This means that those who don't like them/need them
don't have to even see them and those who need them, can easily unpack
a .zip file in the plugins/ folder and everything will look as
integrated as if the feature was in the core.

Oscar

On Apr 12, 2005 2:15 PM, Mark Wu <mark.wu at markplace.net> wrote:
> And, I think this one is very important "Create new blog by blog owner him
> slef" , we also need to add an option to limit the blog numbers that blog
> owner can create
> 
> Mark
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
> [mailto:plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Mark Wu
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 6:25 PM
> To: oscar at renalias.net; plog-general at devel.plogworld.net
> Subject: RE: [pLog-general] Your thoughts on 1.1
> 
> How about mass edit to
> - Post
> - Comments
> - Trackbacks
> - Resource
> - Links
> 
> :D
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net
> [mailto:plog-general-bounces at devel.plogworld.net] On Behalf Of Oscar
> Renalias
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 6:50 PM
> To: plog-general at devel.plogworld.net
> Subject: [pLog-general] Your thoughts on 1.1
> 
> Hello,
> 
> just wanted to know your opinion about 1.1.
> 
> I was thinking that the development cycle for 1.0 was way too long and
> exhausting and that the amount of changes was too big (the amount of bugs
> has proven to be proportional to the amount of changes
> introduced) That's probably one of the reasons why we have had so many
> support requests in the forums so my idea is to shorten the development
> cycle, even if that means bothering users with upgrades to their
> installations every 2-3 months.
> 
> Ben has already started to work on improving the performance in 1.1 and the
> results are more than promising even though work on that front will
> continue. Although I never thought that pLog is slow when using the right
> setup, any performance improvement is good :-) Believe me, these changes are
> so promising that they are enough to warrant a new release.
> 
> Since users only care about new features, we can take Ben's improvements,
> throw in some smaller candy features for users to be happy and we have a 1.1
> release.These are some of the smallish features that I have in mind:
> 
> - new screens to see all trackbacks and comments.
> 
> - everything searchable in the admin backend, so that we can search
> categories, users or even links (useful when we've got a lot of pages full
> of these items)
> 
> - possibilty to upload new files through the pop-up window that allows to
> insert resources to posts in the "new post" page.
> 
> - integration of the anti-spam filter with trackbacks.
> 
> Other big features such as 'friends list', moblogging or integration with
> other tools such as phpbb, vbulletin or mambo will have to wait.
> Basically because of the reasons described above, because I don't feel so
> motivated anymore and because it's time to allow new people to join the team
> and bring new energy. So if anybody wants to take these challenges and work
> on them, be my guest. If not, then we'll have to wait.
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Oscar
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-general mailing list
> pLog-general at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-general
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pLog-general mailing list
> pLog-general at devel.plogworld.net
> http://devel.plogworld.net/mailman/listinfo/plog-general
> 
>